|

October
31, 2003
|
Strategic
Planning Spotlight: Clinical Innovation Task Force
Since the MGH embarked on an intensive strategic planning effort
to determine the future direction of its clinical programs, members of
seven task forces have been meeting, planning and preparing to make recommendations
to the Strategic Planning Steering Committee. Hotline is highlighting
the work of some of these task forces.
The main goal of the Clinical Innovation Task Force is to ensure that
the MGH remains on the cutting edge when it comes to using technology
for patient care. This means continuing the hospital's tradition of developing
clinical innovations in-house and importing technology from other sites.
"Our task force took a broad view of clinical innovation," says
David Rattner, MD, director of the Minimally Invasive Surgery Program
for the Center for Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology (CIMIT),
chief of MGH General Surgery and chair of the task force. "We wanted
to look at innovation in a different way. We are not focusing just on
new devices or drugs, but rather looking at innovative systems that can
help organize and support patient care."
According to Rattner, the first task of the committee is to synchronize
and coordinate the resources within the hospital that already exist to
facilitate clinical innovations. Committees and programs such as the Innovative
Diagnostics and Therapeutics Committee, the Institutional Review Board
(IRB) and CIMIT all facilitate innovations but may not be linked or streamlined
with other key departments.
The committee members have created an inventory of clinical innovations
that are under development at the MGH and elsewhere, and have identified
barriers to implementing such innovations at the hospital. Based on themes
identified in the inventory, three subgroups were formed to focus on the
areas of technology,
translational research and process of care.
To better harness the research capabilities at the institution, the task
force is proposing to establish a Clinical Innovations Council that would
issue requests for proposals based on criteria such as co-sponsorship
by a laboratory and a clinical site, impact on clinical practice, and
ability to obtain future funding. The council also would address issues
regarding integration of innovations into clinical environments.
The committee is proposing to invest in technology support systems that
include both transactional components to support patient care and database
components to support clinical and outcomes reporting, patient safety
and reporting to regulatory bodies.
In addition to looking at what innovations are available, task force members
also are evaluating the barriers to innovation that exist at the hospital
and developing solutions to overcome them. Examples of barriers include
significant financial obstacles; cost of malpractice insurance; lack of
clinical research training, personnel and space; and reimbursement issues
from insurance companies.
The committee is proposing possible solutions to these barriers including
considering different cost accounting methodologies to support innovations,
developing advocacy efforts to address malpractice costs and reimbursement
deficiencies, and creating structures and incentives to provide protected
time and training for research efforts.
Any employee is welcome to submit ideas to the Strategic Planning Steering
Committee by visiting http://is.partners.org/mghstrategicplan
or by sending written ideas through interoffice mail to the Strategic
Planning Steering Committee, Bulfinch 240.
|