Clinical Practice Guidelines - A Needless Intrusion or a Path to Higher Quality Care?
Volume X, Issue 7
Harold J. DeMonaco, M.S. Director of Drug Therapy Management

Img7001.gif (20614 bytes) A recent publication by a group from the MGH and BWH sheds additional light on the value of clinical practice guidelines. Using guidelines originally developed and published by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) in 1994, the researchers examine the relationship between concordance with treatment guidelines and outcomes at 1 year in patients with unstable angina.1 A total of 275 patients admitted with the diagnosis of unstable angina were included in this retrospective study.

Of the 95 recommendations contained with the AHCPR guideline2, the authors chose 8 which they believed to most likely have a clinical effect.

http://www.oz-central.com/

Img7002.gif (42948 bytes)

One hundred eighty-nine patients were found to have been treated in a manner consistent with the 8 highlighted AHCPR recommendations. Eighty-six patients were not. Patient characteristics for both groups were similar. Notable exceptions were: patients treated outside the guidelines tended to be older, have a history of heart failure, demonstrate heart failure on admission have renal insufficiency and a Charlson comorbidity index of 2 or more.

Here are the Kaplan-Meier survival curves:

Img7003.gif (22740 bytes)

 

 

Some important findings associated with 100% concordance to the 8 recommendations:
  • One year survival was 96% as compared to 87% without full concordance
  • One year myocardial infarction-free survival was 91% as compared to 82% without full concordance
  • A four-fold decrease in risk for one-year mortality
  • A three-fold decrease in risk for death or myocardial infarction

Moreover, improved outcomes were seen in those patients at highest risk of death or myocardial infarction. Patients over age 65 years who presented with unstable angina and congestive heart failure who did not receive treatment in concordance with the 8 recommendations had the poorest one year outcomes. Similar patients treated within the recommendations had similar outcomes to those at lower risk. Ironically, those patients over age 65 years with unstable angina and congestive heart failure were least likely to be treated concordant with the 8 recommendations.

While there are some methodological issues with the study, it does strongly support the use of AHCPR guidelines in the management of unstable angina, especially in patients over age 65 years with congestive heart failure.

The MGH now has over 60 clinical practice pathways developed locally by 16 teams. Here is the hotlink to the Operations Improvement Clinical Pathways Home Page (http://is.partners.org/pathways).

References:

  1. Giugliano RP, Lloyd-Jones DM, Camargo, CA et al Association of unstable angina guideline care with improved survival. Arch Intern Med. 160:1775-1780, June 2000 ( http://archinte.ama-assn.org/issues/v160n12/full/ioi90573.html )
  2. Anon. AHCPR Publication No. 94-0602: May 1994 (http://text.nlm.nih.gov/ftrs/pick?dbName=angc&ftrsK=50356&cp=1&t=967041461&collect=ahcpr)
  3.  


aug00clinicalpracticeguidelines 8/15/00