Pain Topics
Shingles and Postherpetic Neuralgia
Anne Louise Oaklander, MD, PhD, and Julia Campeti, BS
Partners Nerve Injury Unit at MGH
|
This article first appeared in Pain
Relief Connection Vol 1 #12, December 19, 2002. Pain
Topics and Pain Relief
Connection are services of MGH Cares
About Pain Relief.
|
Overview
Shingles (herpes zoster) is a painful, necrotizing rash caused by focal reactivation
of latent varicella-zoster virus. The virus, which causes varicella (chickenpox)
in naïve individuals, lies dormant in sensory ganglia long after the
resolution of chickenpox.1 The most common locations for a shingles
rash are the torso and above the eye, but shingles can occur anywhere on the
body.2 Shingles has the highest annual incidence of any neurological
illness3 and will affect 15% of Americans during their lifetime.4
Shingles destroys peripheral sensory neurons and can cause serious complications,
of which the most common is postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), the persistence
of pain in an area affected by shingles at least three months prior. PHN often
resolves within the first six months following shingles, but for some, the
pain can last for years or indefinitely. Age is the most significant risk
factor for developing shingles and, independently, PHN.5 At least
50% of shingles patients over age 50 and 75% of those over 70 will be left
with PHN.5 Consequently, shingles and PHN are a major health threat
to the elderly. Other at-risk populations include those immunocompromised
from illness or medication.
PHN causes combinations of various pain complaints. Some PHN patients will
experience mechanical allodynia, or pain from light touch, and will go to
extremes to avoid contact between their PHN-affected skin and clothing, bed
sheets, or even a light breeze. Other PHN patients will be left with hyperalgesia,
or exaggerated pain following a minimally painful stimulus. Others report
sudden paroxysms of stabbing or lightening-like pain known as lancinating
pain. Another complication of zoster is the chronic itch syndrome known as
postherpetic itch (PHI).6 PHI is more common after shingles on
the face or neck than torso7 and seems more resistant to medical
treatment than PHN.
Treatment of established PHN
Immediate treatment of shingles with antiviral medications and tricyclic antidepressants
is proven to lessen the likelihood and severity of PHN.8 Treatment
of established PHN is similar to that of other neuropathic pain syndromes,
with medications as the most effective therapeutic option. Efficacy and safety
have been established in placebo-controlled double-blind studies for four
categories of treatments:
1. topical local anesthetics
2. tricyclic antidepressants
3. anticonvulsants
4. opioids
It is difficult to predict who will be helped by which medication, so it is
often necessary to try several medications before finding the optimal treatment
and dose for a particular patient. As a rule, the medications most likely
to be effective should be tried first, titrated to an adequate dose, and then
discontinued if ineffective or poorly tolerated. Elderly patients should be
treated with attention to potential cognitive side effects, hypotension, constipation,
cardiac arrhythmia, and urinary retention.
1. Topical anesthetics in patch, cream, and other forms are
a promising advance for PHN. Applied to painful skin, topical anesthetics
act locally, making them ideal for many patients because of the lack of side
effects and drug interactions. The Lidoderm patch contains 5% lidocaine
and is FDA approved for PHN.9 Lidocaine in gel, ointment, or spray
preparations can help patients with pain affecting mucus membranes, especially
by allowing them to engage in specific activities (e.g., chewing). Because
systemic absorption can occur when lidocaine is applied to the mucosa, serum
levels should be tested. Topical creams and ointments containing capsaicin,
a substance P depleter found in chili peppers, are not widely used because
of their intolerable burning sensation upon application.10 A few
small clinical trials of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
have been conducted11 with uneven results.
2. Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are a mainstay of treatment
for PHN and other types of neuropathic pain.12-14 Noradrenergically
active TCAs are effective for persistent ongoing pain,12-15 lancinating
pain, and allodynia as well.15 However, patients rarely obtain
total relief from TCAs and are often unable to tolerate their side effects
(cognitive changes, constipation, dry eyes and mouth, and orthostatic hypotension).
Desipramine, given in the morning, and nortriptyline, given at night, are
the best tolerated; amitriptyline is contraindicated for patients over 65
because of side effects.15 Initial doses range from 10-25 mg daily,
depending on a patient's age and risk for side effects. Elderly patients should
always be started on the lowest dose. Dose escalation should proceed in 10-25
mg weekly increments as tolerated. Most patients achieve pain relief in the
dosage range of 60-100 mg/day. If marked relief is not obtained at this level,
other therapies should be tried. Rare patients benefit from and tolerate doses
ranging from 150-250 mg/day.
3. Anticonvulsant medications decrease neuronal sodium ingress
and excitability. They work against PHN as well as epilepsy because both are
associated with excess central neuronal firing. First-generation anticonvulsants,
such as carbamazepine, have been shown effective in relieving pain,16
but gabapentin, with fewer serious side effects, is now preferred. Because
of its relatively benign side-effect profile and paucity of drug interactions,
gabapentin has become a first-option treatment for neuropathic pain. Moreover,
its tolerability allows for higher dosing for treating pain than necessary
for epilepsy. With no need to monitor blood tests, the drug is also easy to
manage. Gabapentin is effective against different pain qualities in PHN.17,18
Initial dosing is 100-300 mg nightly in geriatric patients, increased by one
pill (i.e., 100 mg or 300 mg) daily toward 1,800-3,600 mg daily. The most
common side effects include mild sedation, dizziness, and edema of the extremities.
Gabapentin is expensive, as are other new anticonvulsants (e.g., lamotrigine,
topirimate) that have not yet been evaluated in clinical trials for PHN.
4. Opioids were once avoided in the treatment of neuropathic
pain because of concerns about lack of efficacy and risk of abuse, but they
have been shown effective and safe for PHN in several double-blinded placebo-controlled
trials.19,20 Risk of abuse is particularly low among geriatric
patients, unless there is prior history.19 Raja et al.'s recent
study compared opioids to TCAs for treatment of PHN and found that both provided
effective pain relief but patients preferred opioids.21 Neither
treatment significantly impaired cognitive function.21 These data confirm
that opioids are a first-line treatment option for geriatric patients. While
extended-release opioids are generally preferable for chronic pain, shorter-acting
agents may lessen cognitive side effects and accumulation of metabolites in
older PHN patients. Methadone is a useful option: long lasting, inexpensive,
and available in minute doses adequate for treating smaller or elderly patients.
Prescriptions for the opioid must be labeled with the notation "for pain"
in order to be filled at most pharmacies around the country.
Other treatment options
Intrathecal steroids: A Japanese group has documented efficacy of intrathecal
methylprednisolone for PHN.22 Subjects were carefully selected
and followed for two years. A 90% rating of good or excellent global pain
relief was reported, higher than for any other known PHN treatment. However,
it is difficult to obtain approval for the intrathecal administration of methylprednisolone,
and intrathecal local anesthetics in the mix can potentially cause spinal
block and hypotension. Confirmation of these data is awaited.
Surgery: Although surgery be effective in some neuropathic pain conditions,
it is not an option for PHN. Neurosurgical options should be considered only
in rare patients with longtime pain unresponsive to all available medical
options. Ablative procedures that sever pain pathways are rarely helpful and
sometimes cause additional pain or neurological problems. Most experts in
the surgical treatment of PHN discourage ablative procedures.23
In rare cases, patients with limited life expectancies may be candidates for
ablative techniques that can produce a pain-free interval of a few months.
Augmentative therapies: Treatments that augment the function of remaining
neurons, such as nerve or spinal cord stimulators, have proven very effective
for treating other types of neuropathic pain.24 Unfortunately,
there are few studies in PHN patients. A recent report25 supports
efficacy but requires confirmation by other groups.
Comprehensive treatments
An interdisciplinary approach to caring for patients disabled by chronic pain
should address the psychosocial burdens and functional impact. Supportive
counseling can help some patients and their families. This can encourage safely
increasing physical activity and foster reacting to pain in ways that are
less negative and self-defeating. Physical and occupational therapies can
address loss of strength and range of motion, and maximize function and minimize
secondary problems associated with disuse.
Conclusion
PHN can be a devastating consequence of shingles, a serious and common neurologic
disease. The elderly and people with immune systems weakened by disease or
medication are at a higher risk of developing PHN than the population in general.
Clinicians should be aware of the importance of treating zoster early and
aggressively with antivirals, analgesics, and TCAs to lessen complications
as well as to provide symptomatic relief. For patients with established PHN,
there are four classes of medications documented in clinical trials to be
effective and safe.
|
To learn more about treating shingles, PHN, and other
zoster-related complications, please visit the websites of the Center
for Shingles and PHN at MGH and the VZV
Research Foundation.
|
References
1. Mahalingam R, Wellish M, Wolf W. Latent varicella-zoster viral DNA in human
trigeminal and thoracic ganglia. N Engl J Med 1999;323:627.
2. Oaklander AL, Rissmiller JG. Postherpetic neuralgia after shingles: an
under-recognized cause of chronic vulvar pain. Obstet
Gynecol 2002;99:625-628.
3. Kurtzke JF. Neuroepidemiology. Ann Neurol 1984;16:265-277.
4. Kost RG, Straus SE. Postherpetic neuralgia - pathogenesis, treatment and
prevention. N Engl J Med 1996;335:32-42.
5. de Moragas JM, Kierland RR. The outcome of patients with herpes zoster.
Arch Dermatol 1957;75:193-196.
6. Oaklander AL, Cohen SP, Raju SV. Intractable postherpetic itch and cutaneous
deafferentation after facial shingles. Pain 2002;96:9-12.
7. Oaklander AL, Bowsher D. Post-Herpetic Itch (PHI), a common neuropathic
complication after shingles (herpes zoster). J Pain
2001;2:18.
8. Bowsher D. Acute herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia: effects of acyclovir
and outcome of treatment with amitriptyline. Br J
Gen Pract 1992;42:244-246.
9. Galer BS, Jensen MP, Ma T, Davies PS, Rowbotham MC. The lidocaine patch
5% effectively treats all neuropathic pain qualities:
results of a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, 3- week efficacy
study with use of the neuropathic pain scale. Clin J Pain 2002;18:297-301.
10. Watson CP, Tyler KL, Bickers DR, Millikan LE, Smith S, Coleman E. A randomized
vehicle- controlled trial of topical capsaicin in
the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. Clin Ther 1993;15:510- 526.
11. Steen,A.E., Reeh,P.W., Kreysel,H.W., Steen,K.H., Topical acetylsalicylic
acid applied to the skin of herpes zoster-patients
strongly reduces their acute neuralgia. Abstracts--8th World Congress on Pain.
IASP Press, Seattle, 1996, p. 276.
12. Max MB, Schafer SC, Culnane M, Smoller B, Dubner R, Gracely RH. Amitriptyline,
but not lorazepam, relieves postherpetic neuralgia.
Neurology 1988;38:1427-1432.
13. Kishore-Kumar R, Max MB, Schafer SC, Gaughan AM, Smoller B, Gracely RH,
Dubner R. Desipramine relieves postherpetic neuralgia.
Clin Pharmacol Ther 1990;47:305-312.
14. Watson CPN, Evans RJ, Reed K, Merskey H, Goldsmith L, Warsh J. Amitriptyline
versus placebo in postherpetic neuralgia. Neurology
1982;32:671-673.
15. Watson CPN, Vernich L, Chipman M, Reed K. Nortriptyline versus amitriptyline
in postherpetic neuralgia: a randomized trial. Neurology
1998;51:1166-1171.
16. Tremont-Lukats IW, Megeff C, Backonja MM. Anticonvulsants for neuropathic
pain syndromes: mechanisms of action and place in
therapy. Drugs 2000;60:1029-1052.
17. Rowbotham MC, Harden N, Stacey B, Bernstein P, Magnus-Miller L. Gabapentin
for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a randomized
controlled trial. JAMA 1998;280:1837-1842.
18. Segal AZ, Rordorf G. Gabapentin as a novel treatment for postherpetic
neuralgia. Neurology 1996;46:1175-1176.
19. Watson CP, Babul N. Efficacy of oxycodone in neuropathic pain: a randomized
trial in postherpetic neuralgia. Neurology 1998;50:1837-1841.
20. Rowbotham MC, Resner-Keller LA, Fields HL. Both intravenous lidocaine
and morphine reduce the pain of postherpetic neuralgia.
Neurology 1991;41:1024-1028.
21. Raja SN, Haythornthwaite JA, Pappagallo M, Clark MR, Travison TG, Sabeen
S, Royall RM, Max MB. Opioids versus antidepressants
in postherpetic neuralgia: a randomized, placebo- controlled
trial. Neurology 2002;59:1015-1021.
22. Kotani N, Kushikata T, Hashimoto H, Kimura F, Muraoka M, Yodono M, Asai
M, Matsuki A. Intrathecal methylprednisolone for intractable
postherpetic neuralgia. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1514- 1519.
23. Loeser,J.D., Surgery for postherpetic neuralgia. In: C.P.N.Watson and
A.A.Gershon (Eds.), Herpes Zoster and Postherpetic
Neuralgia. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 2001, pp. 255-264.
24. Kemler MA, Barendse GA, van Kleef M, de Vet HC, Rijks CP, Furnee CA, Van
den Wildenberg FA. Spinal cord stimulation in patients
with chronic reflex sympathetic dystrophy. N Engl J Med 2000;343:618-624.
25. Harke H, Gretenkort P, Ladleif HU, Koester P, Rahman S. Spinal cord stimulation
in postherpetic neuralgia and in acute herpes zoster
pain. Anesth Analg 2002;94:694-700.