Ten Guidelines for Assessing and Treating Pain

Thomas E. Quinn, MSN, RN, AOCN
Project Director, MGH Cares About Pain Relief

This article first appeared in serial form in Pain Relief Connection Vol 1 #2-#9, February-September 2002. Pain Relief Connection is a service of MGH Cares About Pain Relief

Unnecessary pain interferes with patients' well-being and recovery from illness. With proper management, most patients can achieve reasonable comfort and even be free of pain. Consistently following the guidelines across all care settings and populations will dramatically decrease patient suffering and increase the satisfaction of professional care providers.

1. Pain is a subjective phenomenon; believe the patient

2. Assess the pain carefully and reassess regularly

  1. Take advantage of the patient’s capacities to learn and to use their own internal resources

 4. Use the World Health Organization Analgesic Ladder:

Originally intended as a model for cancer pain management, the WHO Analgesic Ladder is also applicable to other diseases and conditions in all settings.

Step I. Mild pain: Prescribe acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). Note that acetaminophen has analgesic and antipyretic effects, but no anti-inflammatory effect.

Step II. Moderate pain: Add ‘weaker’ opioids or combination products (those that contain an opioid and acetaminophen or an NSAID). The dose is limited by the ‘ceiling effect’ of the non-opioid portion of the analgesic. Ceiling effect refers to the dose at which unacceptable toxicity occurs or the dose beyond which no additional analgesic effect occurs.

Step III. Severe pain: Use stronger opioids. Morphine is the reference drug against which other opioids are compared. If pain is both severe and prolonged, long-acting opioids are recommended. The correct dosage relieves pain with acceptable or no side effects.

Some practitioners have proposed a fourth step:

Step IV. Intractable pain or intractable toxicities from standard analgesics: various ‘interventional’ strategies such as nerve blocks and prolonged intraspinal infusions of anesthetics and analgesics.

Additional principles:

5. Anticipate and treat side effects of analgesics

  1. Prescribe an adequate opioid dose at correct intervals; include a breakthrough or rescue dose.
    1. For most opioids there is no ceiling dose; individualize the treatment: the adequate dose is the dose that relieves pain with acceptable side effects.
    2. When pain is inadequately relieved, escalate dose by 25 – 50% of the current dose
    1. In general, prescribe "by the clock:" around the clock (ATC) at intervals determined by the pharmacokinetics of the drug and patient response. PRN dosing usually assures regular periods of recurrent pain.
    2. Reserve as-needed (PRN) dosing for breakthough/rescue dosing, for intermittent pain states, and for incident pain (see below).
    1. People with either acute or chronic pain can be expected to have occasional acute exacerbations of their pain; a rescue dose of 15-20% of total daily opioid dosage should be available every 1 – 2 hours as needed for breakthrough pain.
    2. If the rescue dose is being used frequently, increase the basal 24 hour dose to an amount at least equal to the current dose plus all rescue doses in the past 24 hours. Depending on the opioid being used, decreasing the prescribed interval may also be appropriate.
    1. When a patient is scheduled to be off the floor for a test or procedure that could potentially delay a scheduled analgesic, make arrangements for the dose to be given at the alternate site.
    2. Anticipate that a patient who normally takes PO meds may also need an alternate route.
  1. Address common misconceptions about tolerance and addiction to opioids.

A major barrier—perhaps the most important barrier—to effective and consistent approaches to pain relief is widespread misconceptions about opioids. These misconceptions lead to fear and prejudice throughout our society. They interfere with the ability of clinicians to provide appropriate care, and contribute to distrust and non-adherence to treatment on the part of patients.

In 2001 the American Pain Society, the American Society of Addiction Medicine, and the American Academy of Pain Medicine developed a consensus statement on definitions of addiction, dependence, and tolerance that are adapted below. Please note that development of tolerance and/or dependence are not symptoms of nor risk factors for addiction.

Don’t let fears of opioid addiction deprive patients of important drugs that can help them live well: educate patients, families, and colleagues about common, inappropriate, fears and misunderstandings.

  1. Use adjuvant medications to supplement opioids

Opioids are usually the most important medications used in the treatment of pain, especially moderate to severe pain. In addition, adjuvant medications (sometimes referred to as "co-analgesics") are frequently indicated. It should be stressed that adjuvants should generally not be used instead of opioids, but to supplement opioids.

9. Base analgesic and other interventions on underlying pathology and specific pain syndromes

    1. Acute, chronic nonmalignant, or malignant pain (associated with life-limiting illnesses such as cancer and AIDS)
    2. Nociceptive vs neuropathic pain
    3. Somatic vs visceral pain
    4. Continuous, recurrent intermittent, incident, or breakthrough pain
    5. End-of-life pain
  1. Use available resources to update clinical knowledge and to improve utilization of specialty care

The vast majority of patients can have their pain adequately managed by clinicians for whom pain is not a specialty practice. Whether one is a practitioner of another specialty or a generalist, information on the management of most pain is readily available and has been for decades. Some of this information is available on the MGH Cares About Pain Relief web site. JCAHO, some political jurisdictions, and many specialties have mandated that clinicians adequately assess and appropriately treat pain.

Unlearning obsolete practices and assumptions can improve pain management. Examples include:

It is inevitable that some patients will not respond as expected to standard interventions for pain. When this occurs, the patient’s pain should be reassessed, neuropathic pain should be considered, and psychosocial factors should be explored. Consultation with or referral to a multidisciplinary pain team should be considered when:

Specialty care or consultation at MGH: